christianity.com fourm people threthen now and then saying about Tos#

TOS# threats:
P-27 Tos- Your last post should be pulled for TOS violation # 19 - airing grievances.
P- 24 Mod Edit - The member never said this.
-------------------------------------
Lesley (volunteer Administrator/moderator)
you have violated TOS #6 which says ... (No ad hominem attacks (for a definition of ad hominem click here). Criticize ideas, not people. )
in your post to earthless, You cannot attack the poster, just the topic.

I have given you a 7 day bann from Hot Topics to cool off. If you continue to POST ad hominem attacks then you risk losing your rights to post on this site at all.
--------------------------------------
Lesley (volunteer Administrator/moderator)
The TOS #6 I pmed you about was when you said to earthless " I doubt that Holy Spirit dwells in you. According to the Bible He does not. that is a personal attack against another member and is not acceptable on these boards, no matter what topic we are discussing.
-------------------------------------
Earthless wrote I hope you can give me the same respect I have given you. I have never ever questioned your relationship with God. I have never ever stated or insinuating that you are not a born-again believer.

Visitors reply to Earthless:
That is another putting words in my mouth. I never said that Earthless is not born-again. I only said that earthless is not filled with Holy Spirit. I was ready to give Bible verses for that. Don't tell lies when you don't have a defence. You know very well that I was talking about it in "I will not be a baptist" forum and you know that I wrote born-again and receiving the Holy Spirit are two different events.

You can be born-again and not spirit filled. That is possible.

If you are looking for respect, give some respect to Benny Hinn too. First parctise before you preach. Also when I asked you to give me one single Bible verse that suggests that raising of dead when dead body touched elisha's tomb was one time event and quoted Rev 22:18. (For I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds to these things, God will add to him the plagues that are written in this book; )

You told me that it is cultic threat. When you say I am cult is that not disrespect? I am being said cult when there is clear indication that you are trying to add "this was one time event" to the Word of God while Bible doesn't say that. Rev 22:18 does apply here and you are a false teacher who adds to the Word of God to sustain your theology. Because your theology needs cruches. It is handicaped
-------------------------------------
Note: Why christianity.com need to ban people who is giving answers from the Bible? Does christianity.com apply TOS# upon each and every visitor without any partiality? Surprising enough NO!!!

If you are giving answers in favor of christianity.com's doctrine you'll be exemted. But if you are talking from Bible but does not match with christianity.com's doctrine you'll be banned.

Here is another example of partiality. Read the excerps taken from forum:
----------------------------------------------
Osirica - (Enthusiast)
HAHAHA! Ok Vin, I will play. What kind of body then are you referring to that we here are debating. A physical body?

You let Vin sidestep you all......

Here we are again, like the Mormons, like the Tongue Preachers, dealing with disrespectful posters, who play psychological games instead of addressing the issue. Earthless. It's time. I watched this thread enough, and I think these last few posts are over the top.

you are using the art of semantic word play and psychological reanalysis to make your points look valid.

You go through such a laundry list of explanation, and Occam's razor applies here as it would apply anywhere else.
----------------------------------------------
Reply of Visitor:
What you wrote is "Ad Hominem Attack" That is TOS #6 but I know Moderators will not ban you because you are on their side. I also don't care about it.
__________________________
P-22 p-22 Earthless (Moderator)
Osirica, please do not attack the person/the individual. Discuss their teachings, etc - but not the person in that manner.
---------------------------------------------
Note: The other people were banned but he is still sitting at P-31 why is it? See he got warning on P-22 but was not banned till P-32. Is Tos # rule exempted for the people who flow in the same stream as chrisitianity.com forum? Don't you see double standard here. They threaten now and then saying about TOS#

Why kick people out if you have enough Bible verses to prove your point? You need not to kick people out. christianity.com does not have courage to face the truth. When they know that they have no answers from the Bible they just threaten people and kick them out.

Christianity.com people edit the messages if it does not suit their purpose or they give threats of TOS# violation. But surprisingly the TOS# thing does not appliy to christianity.com's followers and their moderators. They can attack anybody without any trouble. Don't you see here double standard. If you call yourself Christian your should not be partial.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are some more examples that Christianity.com is dishonest.
Visitor to Christianity.com: P- 32 (Benny hinn fans...)
Calling out false doctrin is one thing and yes is scriptural. I was addressing those attacking the man himself (Benny Hinn) and yea there has been alot of that here. Name calling and so on. Mabe someone could give out some more FACTS on the ministry with out name calling, or judgments!!

I looked at the web stuff and find it to be biased against him (Benny Hinn) and are sceptical of the facts there in.

I am saying that most of the web sites are bashing him (Benny Hinn) and that I can not just take whats being said, as 100% truth.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: This visitor was banned later from posting in christianity.com. If you are sincere why you need to ban people. Hundreds of people were banned who spoke against christianity.com's arguments.